GTK+ 2 Reference Manual |
---|
The GTK+ Drawing ModelThe GTK+ Drawing Model — The GTK+ drawing model in detail |
This chapter describes the GTK+ drawing model in detail. If you are interested in the procedure which GTK+ follows to draw its widgets and windows, you should read this chapter; this will be useful to know if you decide to implement your own widgets. This chapter will also clarify the reasons behind the ways certain things are done in GTK+; for example, why you cannot change the background color of all widgets with the same method.
Programs that run in a windowing system generally create rectangular regions in the screen called windows. Traditional windowing systems do not automatically save the graphical content of windows, and instead ask client programs to repaint those windows whenever it is needed. For example, if a window that is stacked below other windows gets raised to the top, then a client program has to repaint the area that was previously obscured. When the windowing system asks a client program to redraw part of a window, it sends an exposure event to the program for that window.
Here, "windows" means "rectangular regions with automatic clipping", instead of "toplevel application windows". Most windowing systems support nested windows, where the contents of child windows get clipped by the boundaries of their parents. Although GTK+ and GDK in particular may run on a windowing system with no such notion of nested windows, GDK presents the illusion of being under such a system. A toplevel window may contain many subwindows and sub-subwindows, for example, one for the menu bar, one for the document area, one for each scrollbar, and one for the status bar. In addition, controls that receive user input, such as clickable buttons, are likely to have their own subwindows as well.
Generally, the drawing cycle begins when GTK+ receives an
exposure event from the underlying windowing system: if the
user drags a window over another one, the windowing system will
tell the underlying window that it needs to repaint itself. The
drawing cycle can also be initiated when a widget itself decides
that it needs to update its display. For example, when the user
types a character in a GtkEntry
widget, the entry asks GTK+ to queue a redraw operation for
itself.
The following sections describe how GTK+ decides which widgets need to be repainted, and how widgets work internally in terms of the resources they use from the windowing system.
A GdkWindow
represents a window from the underlying windowing system on which GTK+
is running. For example, on X11 it corresponds to a
Window; on Win32, it corresponds to a HANDLE.
The windowing system generates events for these windows. The GDK
interface to the windowing system translates such native events into
GdkEvent
structures and sends them on to the GTK layer. In turn, the GTK layer
finds the widget that corresponds to a particular
GdkWindow
and emits the corresponding event
signals on that widget.
When the program needs to redraw a region of a
GdkWindow
, GDK generates an event of
type GDK_EVENT_EXPOSE
for that window. The GTK+ widget layer in turn finds the
widget that corresponds to that window, and emits the expose-event signal
for that widget.
In principle, each widget could have a
GdkWindow
of its own. With such a
scheme, the drawing cycle would be trivial: when GDK notifies
the GTK layer about an exposure event for a
GdkWindow
, the GTK layer would simply
emit the expose-event
signal for that widget. The widget's expose event
handler would subsequently repaint the widget. No further
work would be necessary; the windowing system would generate
exposure events for each window that needs it, and then each
corresponding widget would draw itself in turn.
However, in practice it is convenient to have widgets which do
not have a GdkWindow
of their own, but
rather share the one from their parent widget. Such widgets
have called gtk_widget_set_has_window
to
disable it; this can be tested easily with the gtk_widget_get_has_window()
function. As such, these are called no-window
widgets.
No-window widgets are useful for various reasons:
Some widgets may want the parent's background to show through, even when they draw on parts of it. For example, consider a theme that uses textured backgrounds, such as gradients or repeating patterns. If each widget had its own window, and in turn its own gradient background, labels would look bad because there would be a visible break with respect to their surroundings. Figure 1, “Windowed label vs. no-window label” shows this undesirable effect.
Reducing the number of windows creates less traffic between GTK+ and the underlying windowing system, especially when getting events.
On the other hand, widgets that would benefit from having a "hard" clipping region may find it more convenient to create their own windows. Also, widgets which want to receive events resulting from user interaction may find it convenient to use windows of their own as well. Widgets may have more than one window if they want to define different regions for capturing events.
When the GTK layer receives an exposure event from GDK, it
finds the widget that corresponds to the window which received
the event. By definition, this corresponds to a widget that
has the GTK_NO_WINDOW
flag turned
off (otherwise, the widget wouldn't own
the window!). First this widget paints its background, and
then, if it is a container widget, it tells each of its
GTK_NO_WINDOW
children to paint
themselves. This process is applied recursively for all the
GTK_NO_WINDOW
descendants of the original
widget.
Note that this process does not get propagated to widgets
which have windows of their own, that is, to widgets which
have the GTK_NO_WINDOW
flag turned off.
If such widgets require redrawing, then the windowing system
will already have sent exposure events to their corresponding
windows. As such, there is no need to
propagate the exposure to them on the
GTK+ side.
Figure 2, “Hierarchical drawing order” shows how a simple toplevel window would
paint itself when it contains only GTK_NO_WINDOW
descendants:
The outermost, thick rectangle is a toplevel GtkWindow
,
which is not a GTK_NO_WINDOW
widget —
as such, it does receive its exposure event as it comes from GDK.
First the GtkWindow
would paint its own
background. Then, it would ask its only child to paint itself,
numbered 2.
The dotted rectangle represents a GtkVBox
, which
has been made the sole child of the
GtkWindow
. Boxes are just layout
containers that do not paint anything by themselves, so this
GtkVBox
would draw nothing, but rather ask
its children to draw themselves. The children are numbered 3 and
6.
The thin rectangle is a GtkFrame
,
which has two children: a label for the frame, numbered 4, and
another label inside, numbered 5. First the frame would draw its
own beveled box, then ask the frame label and its internal child to
draw themselves.
The frame label has no children, so it just draws its text: "Frame Label".
The internal label has no children, so it just draws its text: "This is some text inside the frame!".
The dotted rectangle represents a GtkHBox
. Again,
this does not draw anything by itself, but rather asks its children
to draw themselves. The children are numbered 7 and 9.
The thin rectangle is a GtkButton
with
a single child, numbered 8. First the button would draw its
beveled box, and then it would ask its child to draw itself.
This is a text label which has no children, so it just draws its own text: "Cancel".
Similar to number 7, this is a button with a single child, numbered 10. First the button would draw its beveled box, and then it would ask its child to draw itself.
Similar to number 8, this is a text label which has no children, so it just draws its own text: "OK".
To avoid the flickering that would result from each widget drawing itself in turn, GTK+ uses a double-buffering mechanism. The following sections describe this mechanism in detail.
Remember that the coordinates in a GdkEventExpose are relative to
the GdkWindow
that received the event,
not to the widget whose expose-event
handler is being called. If your widget owns the window, then
these coordinates are probably what you expect. However, if
you have a GTK_NO_WINDOW
widget that
shares its parent's window, then the event's coordinates will
be offset by your widget's allocation: remember that the
allocation is always relative to the parent
window of the widget, not to the parent
widget itself.
For example, if you have a no-window widget whose allocation
is { x=5, y=6,
width
, height
},
then your drawing origin should be at (5, 6), not at
(0, 0).
When you draw on a GdkWindow
, your
drawing gets clipped by any child windows that it may
intersect. Sometimes you need to draw over your child windows
as well; for example, when drawing a drag-handle to resize
something. In this case, turn on the GDK_INCLUDE_INFERIORS
subwindow mode for the GdkGC which you use for
drawing.
When the GTK layer receives an exposure event from GDK, it first finds
the !
widget that
corresponds to the event's window. Then, it emits the expose-event signal for that
widget. As described above, that widget will first draw its background,
and then ask each of its GTK_NO_WINDOW
GTK_NO_WINDOW
children to
draw themselves.
If each of the drawing calls made by each subwidget's
expose-event
handler were sent directly to the
windowing system, flicker could result. This is because areas may get
redrawn repeatedly: the background, then decorative frames, then text
labels, etc. To avoid flicker, GTK+ employs a double
buffering system at the GDK level. Widgets normally don't
know that they are drawing to an off-screen buffer; they just issue their
normal drawing commands, and the buffer gets sent to the windowing system
when all drawing operations are done.
Two basic functions in GDK form the core of the double-buffering
mechanism: gdk_window_begin_paint_region()
and gdk_window_end_paint()
.
The first function tells a GdkWindow
to
create a temporary off-screen buffer for drawing. All
subsequent drawing operations to this window get automatically
redirected to that buffer. The second function actually paints
the buffer onto the on-screen window, and frees the buffer.
It would be inconvenient for all widgets to call
gdk_window_begin_paint_region()
and
gdk_window_end_paint()
at the beginning
and end of their expose-event handlers.
To make this easier, most GTK+ widgets have the
GTK_DOUBLE_BUFFERED
widget flag turned on by
default. When GTK+ encounters such a widget, it automatically
calls gdk_window_begin_paint_region()
before emitting the expose-event signal for the widget, and
then it calls gdk_window_end_paint()
after the signal has been emitted. This is convenient for
most widgets, as they do not need to worry about creating
their own temporary drawing buffers or about calling those
functions.
However, some widgets may prefer to disable this kind of
automatic double buffering and do things on their own. To do
this, turn off the GTK_DOUBLE_BUFFERED
flag in your widget's constructor.
Example 1. Disabling automatic double buffering
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
static void my_widget_init (MyWidget *widget) { ... gtk_widget_set_double_buffered (widget, FALSE); ... } |
When is it convenient to disable double buffering? Generally, this is the case only if your widget gets drawn in such a way that the different drawing operations do not overlap each other. For example, this may be the case for a simple image viewer: it can just draw the image in a single operation. This would not be the case with a word processor, since it will need to draw and over-draw the page's background, then the background for highlighted text, and then the text itself.
Even if you turn off the
GTK_DOUBLE_BUFFERED
flag on a widget, you
can still call
gdk_window_begin_paint_region()
and
gdk_window_end_paint()
by hand to use
temporary drawing buffers.
Generally, applications use the pre-defined widgets in GTK+ and
they do not draw extra things on top of them (the exception
being GtkDrawingArea
). However,
applications may sometimes find it convenient to draw directly
on certain widgets like toplevel windows or event boxes. When
this is the case, GTK+ needs to be told not to overwrite your
drawing afterwards, when the window gets to drawing its default
contents.
GtkWindow
and
GtkEventBox
are the only two widgets
which will draw their default contents unless you turn on the
GTK_APP_PAINTABLE
widget flag. If you turn on
this flag, then they will not draw their contents and let you do
it instead.
The expose-event handler for GtkWindow
is
implemented effectively like this:
static gint gtk_window_expose (GtkWidget *widget, GdkEventExpose *event) { if (!gtk_widget_get_app_paintable (widget)) gtk_paint_flat_box (widget->style, widget->window, GTK_STATE_NORMAL, GTK_SHADOW_NONE, event->area, widget, "base", 0, 0, -1, -1); if (GTK_WIDGET_CLASS (gtk_window_parent_class)->expose_event) return GTK_WIDGET_CLASS (gtk_window_parent_class)->expose_event (widget, event); return FALSE; }
The expose-event handler for GtkEventBox
is implemented in a similar fashion.
Since the expose-event signal runs user-connected handlers before the widget's default handler, what happens is this:
Your own expose-event handler gets run. It paints something on the window or the event box.
The widget's default expose-event handler gets run. If
GTK_APP_PAINTABLE
is turned off (this
is the default), your drawing will be
overwritten. If that flag is turned on, the
widget will not draw its default contents and preserve your
drawing instead.
The expose-event handler for the parent class gets run.
Since both GtkWindow
and
GtkEventBox
are descendants of
GtkContainer
, their no-window
children will be asked to draw themselves recursively, as
described in the section called “Hierarchical drawing”.
Summary of app-paintable widgets.
Turn on the GTK_APP_PAINTABLE
flag if you
intend to draw your own content directly on a
GtkWindow
and
GtkEventBox
. You seldom need to draw
on top of other widgets, and
GtkDrawingArea
ignores this flag, as it
is intended to be drawn on.