=========================================================================
Submission number:
=========================================================================
TITLE:
AUTHORS:
PC MEMBER:
=========================================================================
*** REVIEW:
---  Please provide a detailed review, including justification for
---  your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless
---  the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required.
---  Enter your comments after the "Start" boundary line. Use as 
---  many lines as you need, but make sure that the "End" boundary 
---  marker directly follows the last line of your detailed comments.

=Start==============================================comments=====

5 à 6 lignes de résumé

Forces/avantages

Faiblesses/inconvénients



=End================================================comments=====

*** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE:
---  If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write
---  them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC
---  meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is
---  optional.



=========================================================================
--- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your
--- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the
--- irrelevant lines
*** OVERALL EVALUATION:

---  3 (strong accept)
---  2 (accept)
---  1 (weak accept)
---  0 (borderline paper)
---  -1 (weak reject)
---  -2 (reject)
---  -3 (strong reject)

*** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Place an 'x' mark in the box next to your selection for this category
	[ ]: High
	[ ]: Medium
	[ ]: Low
=========================================================================
Insert your evaluation directly following the colon (:) sign.
Please select an INTEGER (whole-number) score from within the range specified.
(1) is the minimum score.
=========================================================================
Technical Contribution (1 - 10):
=========================================================================
English (1 - 10):
=========================================================================
Accuracy of Title (1 - 10):
=========================================================================
Clarity of Abstract (1 - 10):
=========================================================================
Methods, Algorithms and Proofs Clearly Described (1 - 10):
=========================================================================
Experiments and Results (1 - 10):
=========================================================================
Quality of References (1 - 10):
=========================================================================
Relevance to the Conference (1 - 10):
=========================================================================
Main topic addressed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Place an 'x' mark in the box next to your selection for this category.
	[ ]: theory
	[ ]: experimental results
	[ ]: tool session
=========================================================================
Best Paper Candidate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Place an 'x' mark in the box next to your selection for this category.
	[ ]: Yes
	[ ]: No
=========================================================================